Friday, June 7, 2013

5 Myths about GMO: and what you should really be concerned about

Non-GMO corn from the market 

MYTH 1:

GMO seeds mean you will have more pesticides and herbicides used in the environment

Reality:
Just the opposite is true. GMO plants have saved farmers in Illinois, Wisconsin, and Iowa billions of dollars the last two decades in those toxic chemicals.  The GMO plants are designed to use less chemicals than other seeds
The round-up ready crops have been criticized because they are resistant to "Round Up" - however, Round Up is probably the least toxic of the herbicides used today.

What You Should Be Worried About:

While less herbicide is used (weed killer) the weeds are getting resistant to the herbicides currently and new super weeds are being found. Weeds use natural selection (the first type of genetic engineering) so that those weeds that survive the herbicide grow and reproduce.

MYTH 2:


The toxins engineered in the plants, like Bt, are deadly to humans and cannot be washed off

Reality:

Bt toxin (produced from the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis) has been extensively tested and is not toxic to humans or other animals. In fact, Bt, a toxin made by bacteria, is used widely by organic farmers because it is a natural way to control pests. While some have reported animals that have died in fields of Bt cotton or corn, when autopsies of the animals were done other causes were found. In fact, many deaths from farm animals occur in places all the time-

This same Bt toxin has been used to decrease mosquito outbreaks in Africa, to decrease malaria and dengue fever.
Other strains of the Bt toxin are being examined for activity against leukemia and breast cancer.

What You Should Be Worried About:

In spite of an impressive array of safety, all toxins have some downside. No matter which pesticide, or how safe, there will collateral damage - Monarch butterflies who feed on milkweed, for example, do not do as well when they are near corn that pollinates with Bt toxin.
As much as science searches for a perfect toxin, this certainly is not it. On the bright side new research into pheromones that are scents that keep pests away are being tested.

MYTH 3:


Monsanto will have a monopoly on seeds and this is bad

Reality:

Monsanto does sell the most seeds of any of the major seed makers, but does not have a monopoly.  Since the 1940's farmers have found purchasing seed was easier than raising their own and proprietary seed makers have become an industry.  Monsanto sells 23% of the GM seeds in the US, currently. There are a number of other seed makers that sell GM seeds, as well as non-GMO seed suppliers. Having a number of suppliers insures a more stable market.

What You Should Be Worried About:

Biodiversity is a major issue, and while genetic engineering represents a rapid way to alter crops in case of a major new pest, blight, drought, it is important to have a large seed repository available. GM seeds or not, biodiversity has been rotated out of our crops and is a major issue moving forward. Biodiversity has been an issue for all crops since humans harvested, and continues to be a major issue to our food supply.


MYTH 4:


They engineered tomatoes to withstand cold by putting the gene in from an Arctic fish, which is why tomatoes taste bad 

Reality:

There is no tomato-fish. While this was an experiment, it never came to market. The reason most tomatoes from the store are mealy is they are picked before they are ripe. They do not ripen as a normal tomato would, and thus have an off taste- especially to those who know what a fresh, garden ripened tomato tastes like.


What You Should Worry About:

Genetically engineered salmon that will be farm raised are coming, and like most farm-raised salmon will have less flavor, less beneficial omega-3 fatty acids, and cause more pollution that the wild salmon. Many fish are over-fished and present a danger to our food supply - farm raised fish are not as sustainable as wild fish.

Grizzly bears digging for clams in Alaska. Mother and cub



MYTH 5



Animals know better- when given a choice they don't eat GMO

Reality:

The photographs of the corn, and others that are circulating are all doctored photographs- they are fake. Humans have very sophisticated taste buds, much more than a squirrel or birds. The photographs have been put up as "proof" when in fact, all studies contradict them. In addition, why is it that they blame GMO for killing some animals, when there are fields adjacent with non-GMO feed.  They get tripped up in their own arguments.
Total doctored photograph - and if you know corn, you would look and see that the one labeled organic really isn't

What You Should Worry About:

If you are eating at a lot of chain restaurants, or a lot of processed foods, you are probably obese, and should be eating more whole foods, plant based diets.  If you like meat, you should be eating meat from specialty farms where they are raised on grass instead of grain.


In the war about our food and how we grow it, and its ability to feed a planet with little damage- there is more hyperbole than facts. Eat fresh, grow what you can, enjoy great food- and don't trust a restaurant where they get food from a freezer.







1 comment:

  1. Thank you for this, there is some important information in here that is not heard often enough that has certainly helped me not be just 100% against GMO.

    There are things not considered here, though. For one, farm raised fish may have less of the stuff we want, however, it still has more than any other source of food plus it hasn't been swimming in water that Exxon & BP have flooded with chemicals that are causing maladies all over the globe. The thought of all the mess with oil and dispersant in the gulf has pretty much cancelled my shrimp intake for the rest of my life.

    For another, Monsanto's business practices are just as abhorrent as their agricultural damage. Ask any farmer in the midwest -- you work for Monsanto, or you get sued out of business by Monsanto.

    And I'm not saying it isn't true, but how is it even vaguely possible that importing seed is less expensive than using the seed that is already on your farm? Is it because it needs to be stored and dried before it can be used and that costs money? I'm having trouble imagining any other way.

    ReplyDelete